Thursday, May 14, 2015

Power Struggle of Political Parties - Post WWII

How have political parties changed since World War II? What platforms have changed, and how has the power shifted in the government since then?


Political parties have been around since almost the beginning of our American government. With much speculation, the Founding Fathers created a two-party system that gave our government a sense of organization, and created a process where the parties would provide political leaders for election. This helped define our government’s system, and has sustained our government throughout the years, lasting until present day. Although there has been numerous changes to the system, the principle ideas of political parties have stayed the same. Throughout the years, not only has the platform of the parties changed, but the power of the parties within the government has switched many times.
The original two-party system was established with the Constitution by the Founding Fathers, to give a sense of organization to voters, and to make it easier for the voters to choose which side they want to support by showing the parties' policies and intentions for their position in government. By choosing candidates for elected positions, the voters have a clear idea of what is going on, and it makes it an easier process. The two-party system also prevents either party from gaining complete control of the government whether it is in the House, Senate, or Presidency. By criticizing other party members, and competing for power, the public has the opportunity to see both views and opinions of the two political parties.
The first competing political parties were established as Federalists and Republicans. Their policies were very different from current time, and the national support that they acquired has also changed intensely. The switch in power of the two parties did not happen for decades, but the original system did not work as well as they thought it would; originating the two-party system.
The change in power mainly occurred after World War II. The Great Depression brought about a powerful change in political party power, and created a divide between the parties. President Roosevelt's New Deal Coalition was the primary event that started numerous chain reactions in U.S. politics. This was an act that was passed during the Great Depression that financially aided victims of the economic depression by "passing economic relief measures, social security, laws helping unions, and other bills." (Scholastic). The New Deal Coalition, "redefined the role of federal government as an active agent in promoting the general welfare." (Scholastic). The democrats who supported this action felt that it was the government’s duty to jump in and help whenever possible. This started the obvious disagreement between the two parties where Republicans felt that the government’s power should be contained to minimal amounts, and the Democrats thought that the government was needed whenever possible. For the next twenty years, the democratic party maintained control of the government because of the widespread support that they had gained during the Depression. The New Deal Coalition started the separation, but the main cause of the change in power was due to Nixon’s plan to attain Southern voter support.
Southern Realignment started with the first term of presidency of Richard Nixon. His “Southern Strategy” was meant to "emphasize his support for states’ rights, law and order, and a strong military posture." (Cliff Notes). His goal was to win over Southern conservatives over to the Republican party. This realignment in political party control began the southern states’ change to republican support for the next 40 years. Although the change did not occur as rapidly as Nixon had intended, the gradual change lasted up until 1968, where the republicans gained control. An interesting mark that showed the republican power during that time, and the newness of the split government was the fact that Richard Nixon was the first president to take presidency without major support of his party in the House or Senate. This shows how the split government had never happened, before and how much was in store for the country from that point on.
From Nixon’s presidency to the 21st century republicans fought for power with the democrats, whether it was an odd party president without support in Congress, or a full party government. Nixon, Reagan, and Bush all had party divided power in the presidency during their terms. It was not until Clinton restored party majority in the 1992 election. Republicans then took power of both house of Congress in the 1994 elections. This made Republican leaders optimistic for an upcoming Republican Era, but the Democratic leaders also thought that the voters were going to change their views on the republican actions, and support the democratic party once again. The voters ended up resulting with a party divided control of government with a Republican majority in Congress, and a Democratic President of Bill Clinton. The government power changed yet again in the next presidential election, where George W. Bush maintained Republican political control from 2003 to 2006. It was not until the recent election of President Barack Obama where the democrats had majority control in both the presidency, and both houses of Congress, but in his second term of presidency, the House was attained by the republicans.

The fluctuation in political party control shows how diverse and changing our nation’s views on politics are, one could view that as a good or bad thing. The positive outlook of the fluctuating power shows how the American voters have different views, and how they are always thinking of new ways to alter the government for the better. On the other hand, the fluctuating party control could also show a sense of instability in our government. If you trace the political parties from their originating position, both power and platforms have changed greatly.The platforms of the parties have also changed, but not as substantially as the power struggle.  The majority power has obviously changed from Democratic to Republican numerous times, whether it was from Nixon’s Southern Realignment, or the changing views of voters today.


Sources


Poltical Party Platforms - This source provided me with a clear comparison of both parties' platforms. It also traced their change throughout the years, beginning with their original positions, to current day. This not only allowed me to see how they changed, but how they had started and what their views were like.
Roles of Political Parties - This source told me what the actual roles of political parties are. It explained why they were created, and what they do today. This helped me realize the change in their roles throughout the years as well.
Change in Power - This website provided me with my main source of research for my paper. It explained what events first started the change in political party majority, and how it occurred. I learned about Roosevelt's New Deal Coalition, and Nixon's Southern Realignment.
New Deal Coalition - This source gave me more information on the New Deal Coalition, and also how the democratic party lost support during this time. It also explained the exact affect that the Great Depression had on party support.
Government in America by: Edwards, Watenberg, Lineberry - The APUSH textbook explained more on the Southern Realignment, and what actually happened during that time. It also had many helpful comparison charts that helped me see the roles of parties more clearly. There were a couple graphs of voting poles, and the demographic of the party support that helped see who the voters were and what backgrounds they came from.
Founding Fathers - This source gave me quotes from the Founding Fathers, which helped me see their reasoning behind creating the parties, and how much hesitation they had while doing this.

Images 













Friday, May 1, 2015

Cinderella Man

When creating a movie based on an event in history, there is always the challenge of keeping the movie accurate, while writing it to appeal to the viewers. The director has a very difficult job of forming the event so that the viewers stay intrigued and interested, while they stay true to the story. Ron Howard, the director of Cinderella Man, did a great job of keeping the basis of the Great Depression in tact, while keeping the story entertaining. Granted, not all aspects of the movie are true because he had to exaggerate some things to get the right emotions and thought from the viewers, the main ideas of the Great Depression are correct. By watching the movie, I learned more about how the Great Depression really affected families and individuals, and I learned it in an interesting way that made me want to learn more.
Ron Howard did a great job of portraying the struggles of the Great Depression, and how emotional it made people. The main character James J. Braddock, in the movie, had to take many desperate measures so that his family could survive the depression. In the movie Howard tweaks an event that truthfully occurred, to make the audience feel a type of empathy for Braddock. In the movie, Braddock goes to the boxing association and begs for money from the benefactors; this scene in the movie shows Braddock at a level of emotional wreckage that it is almost unbearable to watch. Although in history Braddock did beg for money for his family, he only went to one person to do so. That person later went on Braddock’s behalf to ask for money for him from the boxing association. This minor change in the script was made solely for the audience to be more invested and have sympathy for Braddock. This scene is one of many throughout the movie that portrays how far Braddock was willing to go so that he could provide for his family.
The movie did a good job of showing the struggle that Braddock’s family went through during the Great Depression. Braddock did in fact have to go to the fence the docks and hope for a job everyday. This shows how rare work was, and how this made it even harder for people to survive the depression with minimal work. Many days men did not have work to do, and they were left with the uncertainty that they would be able to put food on the table for their kids, or if they could pay their heating bill during the winter. This representation stayed true to the struggles of the Great Depression, and showed it in a way that made the audience feel with the main character.
Another minor tweak Howard made to the story involved Braddock’s family. Although these changes were almost unaffected towards the Great Depression, it just further made the audience more involved in Braddock’s family. Braddock’s children in the movie were all born by the time of the mid 1930’s but in reality this was not true. By changing the children’s ages, or birthdates, it allows the audience to begin to feel for the children. The kids were still very young in the movie, and it makes it even harsher for the children to struggle at such a young age. The thought of having three struggling children makes the idea of the Great Depression even more horrific and cruel, this idea always makes the audience more empathetic for the children. This representation of children suffering might not have been completely true to Braddock’s family, but it was certainly true of the Great Depression as a whole. Thousands of children were affected because of the Great Depression, whether it was losing their parents, starving, or sleeping in the streets. This exaggeration in the movie furthers the ideas of the Great Depression.
The biggest change in the movie that actually affected people involved, was the representation of Max Baer. In the movie Baer is depicted as a cruel, merciless fighter. He is almost shown as a murderer to the two boxers that were killed due to his right hand. The depiction of Baer was emphasized so that the audience would not empathize with him, rather Braddock. If Howard had truly portrayed Baer as a good guy that was involved in a violent sport, the audience would not be able to blame, or to name a antagonist in the plot. This could confuse the audience, and draw away from Howard’s intentions for the movie. 
Overall the changes that Howard made mostly stayed true to the Great Depression facts, 


with the exception of Baer’s character. All of the changes were made so that the audience’s focus 

would be centered around Braddock’s character and life. The exaggerations and emphasizes only 

made the story a more entertaining and emotional storyline, the feeling that the movie gave of the 

Great Depression was still insightful and allowed the viewer to see, hear, and feel what it was like 

during that time period.







Sources